Sacro News
Total Pageviews
Wednesday, June 24, 2015
Tuesday, June 23, 2015
Monday, June 22, 2015
Wednesday, May 20, 2015
South Africa under Zuma
THE REAL DILEMA OF PRESIDENT ZUMA.
In 1994 the ANC under the leadership of Nelson
Mandela win the first democratic election in South Africa. It was highly likely
that the revenge on apartheid would have led to the possible genocide of the
white population of the country. Due to the negotiations between the new
government some deals must have been made, these deals must have include enough
security for the then special forces and other well trained South African
Defence forces to stand down and on the other hand enough control for the new
government and their freedom fighters to accept the deal. Part of the deal was
to close all criminal files of the ANC, their freedom fighters and the special
forces of the previous government. The reality of the matter was that the
public especially the new voters wanted to see some justice, the only way to
achieve this was through a process of reconciliation and the delivery of some
people.
Some people had to take the fall for the rest
of the country, had to take the fall to hide the criminal involvement of the
new found freedom fighter and the old South African Defence force.
This deal always bothered me as some of the
people that took the fall for the so called justice were always under the
command of high ranking officers that walk totally free from the
investigations, and left the following questions in my mind:
1)
Why did
the new government negotiate?
2)
Why did
they not open all the files and prosecute all the people they wanted to?
And then
3)
Why did
they wait till the Zuma era to start major destabilisation and implementation?
4)
What or
who caused the delays in the total redistribution of farm properties?
Any reasonable negotiation is normally
earmarked by power sharing of the parties negotiating, it is therefore
reasonable to accept that the previous government and concerned military
parties had some reasonably strong cards on the table, which might have been
the outgoing highly trained military forces and possibly the weapons still
within the power of these forces. If this assumption is close to the truth the
events following make more sense.
It makes sense that the new Government started
playing the waiting game to wait for the military forces ageing and weaponry
become outdated. During this period the constitution was designed to protect
all the people in South Africa, to keep the ageing military trained forces from
forming uprising to the government.
The ANC sat with their first dilemma to keep
the balance between inpatient voters and the strong and unbeatable military
trained people in the country, to combat this they decided to test the reaction
from the predominant white trained people by changing a few street names. Once
they realise that the resistance was not much they moved slightly towards more
radical changes, keeping in mind that the forces are watching them.
I believe that they have started planning to allow
the trained men to age to such a point where the only resistance would be
mostly untrained people, that would bring us to the Zuma era, an era where
trained South African Defence Force people would reach the age of retirement,
where the impact of their resistance would become significantly smaller, where
they could be controlled by a smaller police force.
Sequence of some events that I based
my speculation on.
1)
THE FAILED
EVENT TO REGISTER THE OLD DEFENSE FORCE PEOPLE FOR A PENSION SCHEME.
One of the problems that the ANC encountered
was the lack of special force records available, to progress with their radical
plan it was of utmost importance that they have up to date intelligence on who
is still alive and who is still in the country.
How did I get to this conclusion?
All government pension funds and or allowances
are restricted to individuals that do not have property and or a fixed income,
suddenly for no reason at all they announced that all ex-SADF member will
qualify for a pension with no restrictions. This event was only considered when
the time has expired and due to the fact that anybody that fought in the Angola
and other wars for the SADF was now at the age of retirement. It was still
however very important that they know the whereabouts of these ex-soldiers.
If they had proper records from all the
ex-soldiers it would have been possible to automatically register the pensions
and only use the normal procedures to find out if they were still alive. The
procedure however asked all ex members to register at certain points for this
pension, part of the form was the unit that they have served under. This
immediately left a ratty smell of information gathering; as the old defence
force system had a force number that automatically place the person in units. The
question that I had to ask was: Did they have these records or are they trying
to create a new record?
The initiative however failed horribly as no
special forces fell for it and registered for these pensions.
This led the ANC to the conclusion that all
these soldiers are either out of the country or not able to register anymore.
This then led to the second event...
2)
THE
ANOUNCEMENT THAT ALL PROFESSIONAL SOLDIERS FIGHTING AS MERCENARIES IN OTHER
COUNTRIES ARE NOW ILLEGAL AND COULD NOT RETURN TO SOUTH AFRICA WITHOUT
PROCECUTION.
Once these measures was in place the first
destabilisation of the country started. The obvious question now must be.
Why destabilise the country and what advantages
will it holds for the ruling party?
Like in all democracies across the world it is
important to stir the voters to a point where they demand action, where they
demand the intervention of military or police action. In Africa however
destabilisation means that the current ruler has the ability to remain in power
to become an autocratic leader. I based this fact on rulers like Robert Mugabe
who destabilise and become lifelong presidents. Our President needs to remain
president to avoid criminal prosecution and the following events follow.
1)
The
destabilising of parliament procedures, and the power showed of armed forces
entering parliament. The event according to me was staged to prevent people to
look at other events that unfolded in the country. All voter eyes were securely
on parliament while the president secured the support of a Chinese ally to the
detriment of the workforce in South Africa. The negotiating events almost went
unnoticed by the voters as their attention was captured by Julius Malema and
the noise in parliament. The storm in parliament however did not last long
enough for Zuma to complete all his negotiations with his new found friends and
his movement toward the Russians as new allies.
2)
The youth
start their march to destroy all historical monuments in South Africa.
According to me this event was designed in twofold, firstly to see how the
resistance would react especially the Afrikaner and military trained people and
secondly to keep the press and social media busy while the president start
negotiations with the Russians. We must remember that these negotiations was
with governments that have no human rights or constitutions in place, in fact
both these countries use strong military forces to supress any resistance in
their own countries, both countries will infiltrate any country without good
reason. The masking event was however
not as successful as Zuma wished it to have been. The Afrikaner and ex-military
once again did not fall for the trick, only a few reacted and once again the
much feared ex-special forces did not show their faces, the majority of people
that they hoped would make the event huge did not react. The ANC and Zuma needed
a new event an event that would force great reaction.
3)
Xenophobia
attacks broke out after the Zulu king and Jacob Zuma’s own son made well
planned statements to turn the streets of Durban and Johannesburg into battle
fields. The event captured the imagination of all the journalist in the world
and people in South Africa demanded the military to be released on the streets
to restore law and order. According to
Zuma and his undercover allies the EFF the table was now set for the radical
changes and the implementation of property reforms in South Africa. The gears
in the clock were set and laws and suggestions rolled out before the two
leaders had the time to tell their people that the event did not succeed. They
had no time to tell that the reaction of the neighbouring countries was not
favourable and they never expected the Nigerian government to announce that the
80 old South African soldiers have defeated Boka Haram and accomplished more in
two months than their defence force with the US Special Forces and the British
forces could accomplish in six years. They did not keep in mind that the
reaction against xenophobia from the Nigerian government would force them to
acknowledge the ex-SADF military force and abolish the ban on these men.
The dilemma of Jacob Zuma
It was expected that the era of Jacob Zuma
would have been the era of change, the era where the resistance would have
changed from a trained military force to a complaining non-threatening public
opinion. He and his friend Julius would have destabilise the country, new
communist laws would have been implemented and a new life-long president would
have been born.
To implement such radical changes takes lots of
planning with coordinated actions and implementations by your appointed crowd.
All this was in place each appointed minister
had his briefing and knew when to announce the new schemes, with military in
the streets after the public demanded action on xenophobia, an uprising by old
men from the ex-Sadf was unlikely.
The problem was the events that suddenly played
out, the well organised ministers was not briefed or trained on how to judge
the reactions, they had jobs to do and the two horrible twins (Jacob and Julius)
would ensure that the destabilisation of the country would spread panic within
the country to such a stage that the resistance would not even care about the
reforms, they would have kept the resistance busy with marches against
xenophobia, and the destruction of monuments. The police would have been demilitarising
to ensure that the resistance had no protection if the military moved in the
streets. They had the idea that these actions would have flushed the possible
military resistance out and that the military presence would have captured an
unorganised resistance.
The reality was however far removed from the
planned actions, they did not keep in mind that the Afrikaner was the architect
of guerrilla warfare, they forgot that the special forces was trained to combat
communism and that they would have recognise the propaganda tactics of the ANC.
Zuma did not keep in mind, and did not expect
that only a few Afrikaners would have reacted to the destruction of monuments,
that the xenophobia would force him to make peace with his apartheid friends in
Africa and that his formal friends would use and praised the ex-soldiers of the
SADF Special Forces. He did not expect that the eighty well trained men in
Nigeria would make headlines and prove that they could still do what the USA
and Britain could not in six years. That they would prove to the world that
their military capabilities is still the best in the world even at their
retirement age.
The well organised ministers however continued
to roll out new laws to supress the Afrikaner further; it is however clear that
the redistribution was not thought through properly and that one man drafted a
suggestion on farmland without any legal assistance.
Even the main opposition party was caught off
guard and showed their involvement in the destruction pre maturely, by voting
with the ANC against the protection of historical monuments in Cape Town.
Zuma is sitting with the dilemma that he needs
to reinforce the basic principles, which he needs to calm his voters down by
proving some of the lies that they included into history. Suddenly the Sunday
Times is used to publish photographs of Quito Cuanavale to show the people how
the Ex-SADF withdraws out of Angola, to prove that the ANC have won the war.
They however forgot to check the vehicles in the photograph crossing the
Cubango River and the time frames of withdrawal. In the photo is a bullnose Mercedes
troop carrier of the early 1970’s, these vehicles were decommissioned in the
80’s and was not used by the SADF in 1988. The Angolan Government troops
however used these vehicles, so if this was the real withdrawal it shows a
captured vehicle.
On the same bridge it shows old land Rovers,
these vehicles was used to transport senior officers in Angola, the Land Rovers
was however upgraded to new land rovers in the middle 80’s, so once again why
did the SADF use old vehicles in the attack? Let us discuss these photos some
other time.
It seems that the same military card is still
on the table, that the farm murders and exclusion of white South African in the
economic market did not break the Afrikaner spirit. In fact the only thing that
the ANC managed to change in 20 years is the crime statistics, and the failure
of all government infrastructures. They managed to make us world leaders in
murder rates; they managed to keep the voter uneducated and poor, become the
first country in the world to face a total power failure.
Your move comrade china Jacob (Nkandla) Zuma
Willie Beetge
Wednesday, April 29, 2015
Conspiracy or stupidity
Conspiracy or stupidity
With violence riddling
the streets of the once beautiful South Africa with Xenophobia, with senseless
murders of White Farmers and widespread black on black murders in the poverty
stricken areas, with a government blaming everybody but themselves, the poverty
increase and jobs are lost daily.
Investors are
withdrawing their investments, and companies move out of the range of violent
strikes during wage negotiations. Neighbouring countries recall their
ambassadors in protest against the Xenophobic attacks on their citizens, their
protest can be well founded if the history that passed the black censor pen of
the ANC , come to the foreground, in the
fact that the same people that assist the ANC to end apartheid is the people
now slayed in the streets. One look at the farm murders 7000 since 1994, where
farmers are raped mutilated and killed for a few Rand left in their wallets; we
see the brutal murders in the townships where political supporters kill
supporters of other beliefs. But then your eyes turn across the burning tyres,
the bodies and grieving families and come to rest on the man that lead these
people in silence, a silence that sound like approval, you see the man that needs
to clinch to his position as president to avoid criminal prosecution for his
criminal activities under the protection of voters that believed and still
believe that he will save them from poverty. As my eyes rest on the pathetic
figure through the thick smoke and blood stained windows of farmers and black
townships the once important question of competency become a new question of
conspiracy a question of greed and power.
My mind entangle in
the soviet like story told by events following each other to create total chaos
in the streets, events that spell the possible end of freedom by the same
people who shed blood to achieve it over the years, I see the celebration of
freedom day from behind the bars needed to protect the citizens against
uncontrollable crime, the celebrations of peace while leaders shed the blame onto
anyone but themselves, words that justify the killing of a foreigner in
Johannesburg because his immigration papers were not in order. I listen to the
words that condemn and justify in the same sentence, words that contradict each
other to stimulate the dangerous mob mentality.
The questions in my mind want to prove that stupidity is the cause but
the reality forces me to ask the question differently. Through the thick smoke
I can see the man with the red beret his left hand clinch to the machete, under
his red overall, that want to slice through the last strings that keep the
state governable, the words coming from his mouth condemn the violence, his
sentence does not stop there it continue with the description of the forceful
removal of white supremacy, the destruction of history. His words excite the
rent a crowd that he promised food if they listen to him. They all dance as he
sings “kiss the Boer” the excitement drive them to believe, to the believe that
they can take what they need from the white citizens, they believe that their
poverty is no more, that the food he fed them the words of encouragement to
violence solved the poverty. But as they leave and drive to their government
created shacks they must realise that there is no work tomorrow, that there is
no money coming in.
My mind slip to the
laughing man in parliament as opposition leaders condemn his actions, as they
accuse him of misconduct and I cannot help to replace the question of stupidity
with a question of planned stupidity. We are waiting for his response for his explanation
but he talked in riddles he remain silent.
We witnessed the
petition of farmers, the cry from social media to stop the killing, but he remains
silent. We see how students try to antagonise white people by breaking down all
the historical monuments but he remains silent. When the xenophobic attacks
break out we wait for his response but he only respond days later with not much
more that silence.
The new question that
sings round my ears is; how can you become lifelong president? In my quest for
an answer my eyes turn to the fastest declining economy in the decade, I see Mugabe
with gold on his fingers, I see how the people in his country fled to South
Africa to find means to feed their family, where the Zimbabwe Dollar has become
cheaper than toilette paper and I wonder if this answer my question, I wonder
if the instability in the country contributed to his long term of presidency.
If this is the truth
then I wonder if Julius Malema and Jacob Zuma are not working together, if
their master plan does not involve instability, if the silence of our President
is not a quiet approval of his once close comrade Julius.
So the question
remain, do they destroy the country and her economy due to stupidity or is it a
conspiracy?
Stop the senceless murders
Zuma blame everybody but himself.
President Jacob Zuma once again refuses to take
responsibility or any accountability for Xenophobic attacks during past few
weeks.
In a speech that he delivered on Freedom day,
he blamed the violence and xenophobic attacks on “Apartheid” and the
colonialism in South Africa which ended more than 20 years ago; he also laid
the blame at the door of neighbouring countries, blaming them for allowing their
people to come to South Arica.
The lack of ability to take responsibility is a
clear sign of his inability to lead the country away from violence and into a united
nation that can build South Africa and her economy, to eradicate the poverty.
He further stated that the man that was killed
in Johannesburg was an illegal immigrant. This statement gave me the feeling
that he agree with the xenophobic attacks as long as the person killed has no
papers, as long as the person is illegal in the country.
I have a problem with the contradiction in the
above statements; his sentiment is with the violence although he blames it on
the previous dispensation in South Africa. The questions that keep knocking on
my mind are;
How can this country become peaceful while the
president refuses to condemn murders in the country, while the president led in
violence?
How can a country provide security for investors
and business people if the president makes excuses for people that commit
violent crimes?
How can we eradicate poverty in our beloved
country while the president promotes strikes and violence?
He then continues with his speech honouring the
South Africans that died during the xenophobic attacks, as if the foreigners have
attacked our people and these people died defending their belongings, as if these
people were ordered by government to march up and defend the country.
Or did they?
How can the president defy the laws of the
country?
How can the president promote vigilantes to run
free, to kill those that they do not agree with?
How can our president enforce the law, if he has no respect for it himself?
On the same day Julius Malema leader of the EFF
sang “kiss the boer” before he told the followers that came for the food, to
end the white ownership of property. He
continues to say that they must take the land back.
Clearly this is a call for more violence in a
country where 7000 farmers have been brutally raped tortured and murdered since
the ANC came to power. In a country that has the highest murder rate in the
world. In a country where the murder rate
compares with war stricken countries in the world.
This irresponsible leadership is unacceptable, where
leaders call on mob mentality like crime lords.
Where they lead without consequences
We as a white and black community demand that
you stop the murders stop the violent crimes, stop ignoring the facts, stop
blaming others. Become responsible
leaders, leaders that care about the people they lead.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)